Proof.
In satz:7-3 is
|
|
∇vk•f′pk(·,u,∇u)
= div (vk f′pk(·,u,∇u)
- vk div (f′pk(·,u,∇u)) ,
|
|
|
therefore, by the divergence theorem,
|
|
| |
div (vk f′pk(·,u,∇u)) dLn
=
| |
vk f′pk(·,u,∇u)•νΩ dHn-1 .
|
|
|
This proves the representation for ∂vE(u) .
Now, in satz:7-4-(1) and satz:7-4-(2),
choose, for given k∈{1,...,N} , an arbitrary
function vk∈C01(Ω) and set vl=0 for k≠l .
This gives
|
|
0 = ∂vE(u)
=
| |
vk(f′zk(·,u,∇u)
- div (f′pk(·, u,∇u))) dLn.
|
|
|
Since vk is an arbitrary function with compact support,
it follows, that the second factor in the integrand has to vanish.
This argumentation is a fundamental one in calculus of variations,
therefore it is formulated below in
in satz:7-5 as a separate lemma.
This proves, that the
EULER-LAGRANGE equations are satisfied.
To prove satz:7-4-(2), we insert this result into the
representation of ∂vE(u) and obtain, that for all
v∈C1(clos(Ω);RN)
|
|
0 =
| |
| |
vk
f′pk(·,u,∇u)•νΩ dHn-1 .
|
|
|
Then the same argumentation as above implies the boundary conditions,
where satz:7-5 has to be applied
to the surface measure
Hn-1 on ∂Ω instead to
the LEBESGUE measure Ln on Ω .
|