Proof.
For u , v as in the assertion
|
| |
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
| |
(-1)|α|
| |
∂α(aαT v)•u dLn
(partial integration)
|
|
|
| | |
| |
|
|
with LT as in the assertion.
We have to show, that the differential operator LT
has a representation as in sect:1-1.
This follows using the
LEIBNIZ rule
(Proof see below)
for functions v, w∈Cm(Ω; R) , where
Applying this LEIBNIZ rule
to the transposed operator we obtain
|
| |
| | |
|
| | |
| |
(
| |
(-1)|α|
| ( | | ) |
∂α-βaTα ) ∂βv ,
|
|
| |
|
|
which is a representation of LT as in sect:1-1.
|
Remark:
This also shows, that it is sufficient to assume
aα∈C|α|(Ω' ; RM×N)
(see sect:1-7-(3) below).
|
It remains to prove the uniqueness of LT .
For this let M be another operator
with the same properties as LT in sect:1-6.
Then for all u , v
Using the Fundamental Lemma of the Caculus of Variations
(see
[Analysis III:Fundamental lemma]
)
we obtain, that LT(v)-M(v)=0 for
all v∈C0m(Ω; RM) .
We claim, that this then also holds
for all v∈Cm(Ω;RM) .
This would imply LT=M .
For the proof of this claim let v∈Cm(Ω; RM) and x∈Ω .
Choose a function η∈C0m(Ω) so,
that η=1 in a small neighbourhood of x .
Then LT(ηv)=M(ηv) . Moreover,
∂α(ηv)(x)=∂αv(x) for all |α|≦m .
From the representation of the operators LT and M
as linear partial differential operators in sect:1-1
it therefore follows, that LT(ηv)(x) = LT(v)(x) and
M(ηv)(x) = M(v)(x) .
Since this holds for all x∈Ω ,
we have proved that LT(v) = M(v) .
|